Wooooow, love this!!! I aspire to this level of writing. 🤩

I know this is still draft, so I won’t review the whole thing. But I noticed that some of the screenshots get rendered bigger (we seem to scale them to fit the whole width). Think it would look nicer if the screenshots would be rougly same width. Maybe you can re-do the git-show-d26e538d04675de89c1eb38ec5ce457c2a380853.png and crop it roughly to the width of the others?

Reviewing session

review: Order both updates and blogposts reverse chronologically

review: Use emoji, also name the other tool first

review: “that”? I don’t understand the sentence with “that”?

review: Fix link using wrong type of parentheses

review: “push to”, as otherwise it expands to “push from”

review: Fix broken link

review: May not be your style, but I’d use “which” since…

the number of remote helpers available on a particular machine is known and usually very limited.

review: That string actually is the Node ID

review: Fix broken link

review: Reorganize links

There were some issues with links (see previous commits), so I decided to reorganize all of them.

review: Provide language tag for code fence

review: Use aha to unfiformly convert ANSI colors to HTML

highlighting: Add more complete Monokai

review: Reformat configs to be more readable

review: Use wide code blocks

Changes:

• Accepted review changes

Changes:

• Changed date of post
• Squashed reviews in lorenz’s latest revision, since my previous revision included experimental changes
• Rebased

Final touches